subcommand for displaying support crypt algorithms.
- Aliases
- avoid looping aliases
- Domain
- optional limits for number of:
+ accounts
+ aliases
+ destinations/alias
+ alias domains
Database:
public.users.digestmd5: add "character varying(48)"
Outlook will love it. (`doveadm pw -s DIGEST-MD5.hex -p 1 -u 0`)
- Non-root usage [madduck@madduck.net]:
- Provide /usr/share/vmm/vmm-{mkdirs,rmdirs,du} setuid wrappers that do
precisely what they have to and no more. The should probably even call
/usr/share/vmm/vmm-wrapper-helper as unprivileged user to parse the
arguments, match them with the database and obtain the actual data to
process, e.g. email@add.ress → home directory mapping from the DB, or
obtaining the set of precreatable maildirs from the config.
- configset and configure need root, it is questionable whether these
can/should be wrapped, as they will be disabled anyway for Debian, and
they are root-like activities (unlike day-to-day postmaster work).
- Pascal suggested to use hooks:
07 23:36 <Faxe> zwei config settings handle_dir in domain und account
07 23:37 <Faxe> und dann post-{domain,user}add scripte, die den wrapper aufrufen
- relay_domains management [madduck@madduck.net]:
- should be in a separate table
- default aliases [madduck@madduck.net]
- it should be possible to define a set of default aliases and their
destinations for a domain, e.g. postmaster@ and abuse@. For most
flexibility, there ought to be a m:n table connecting domains to sets of
default aliases. These aliases then get treated like normal aliases
unless they are overridden by a real alias.
- list{aliases,accounts,relocated,addresses} subcommands [madduck@madduck.net]
- I would find it useful if I could query the database for all defined
users, aliases, relocated, and addresses (the union of all three).
Ideally, the commands would also take % wildcards, so that I can limit
the output
- domain and account notes [madduck@madduck.net]:
- I found it useful to keep a free-text "notes" field for accounts and
domains, where the admin can store anything s/he wants. This would
simply be a new field in the two tables and the appropriate UI changes.